Greg Keller wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:58:24 -0500
From: Michael Di Domenico <mailto:mdidomeni...@gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] cisco networking
To: Glen Dosey mailto:dos...@r-networks.net>>
Cc: Beowulf@beowulf.org <mailto:Beowulf@beowu
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:58:24 -0500
From: Michael Di Domenico
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] cisco networking
To: Glen Dosey
Cc: Beowulf@beowulf.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Glen Dosey
wrote:
You can have multiple ether
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Glen Dosey wrote:
> You can have multiple ether-channel links between 2 switches. The
> limitation is that if they are in the same layer 2 broadcast domain
> (VLAN) only 1 will be active and STP will block the other.
>
> If you place each switch in a separate netwo
You can have multiple ether-channel links between 2 switches. The
limitation is that if they are in the same layer 2 broadcast domain
(VLAN) only 1 will be active and STP will block the other.
If you place each switch in a separate network you could use equal cost
load balancing across multiple po
its my understanding that you can only have one lacp/etherchannel link
between two cisco switches and that link can only comprise up to eight
actual links
which using 10Gbps links would yield around ~8GB/sec
Does anyone know if it's possible to get more? Between two Cisco 6500's?
Im pretty sure
