5 5519
--- www.quadrics.com<http://www.quadrics.com/>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hearns
Sent: 24 September 2008 16:06
To: beowulf@beowulf.org
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Pretty High Performance Computing
2008/9/24 Ellis Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Ellis Wilson wrote:
I guess I don't quite understand why you disagree Prentice. With the
exception that middleware doesn't strive to be a classification per se,
just a solution, it still consists of a "style of computing where you
sacrifice absolute high performance because
> I call this Pretty High Performance Computing (PHPC).
Or high productivity computing?
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jon Forrest wrote:
Given the recent discussion of whether running
multiple services and other such things affects
the running of a cluster, I'd like to propose
a new classification of computing.
I call this Pretty High Performance Computing (PHPC).
This is a style of comput
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Hearns
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:06 AM
To: beowulf@beowulf.org
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Pretty High Performance Computing
2008/9/24 Ellis Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Thi
2008/9/24 Ellis Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This assumes my understanding of middleware is correct in that it is a
> package or entire system that simplifies things by being somewhat
> blackboxed and ready to go. Anything canned like tuna is bound to
> contain too much salt.
>
> I believe that
Middleware is something that goes in between, hence the name middleware.
In the case of HPC, I would call ROCKS or Platform OCS middleware. These
software packages go in between the administrator and the actual cluster
software/OS configuration to make things easier to configure. They are
in the mi
I guess I don't quite understand why you disagree Prentice. With the
exception that middleware doesn't strive to be a classification per se,
just a solution, it still consists of a "style of computing where you
sacrifice absolute high performance because of issues relating to any
combination o
Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
I'd argue we might know this already as middleware.
That makes absolutely no sense.
Best regards from a hotel in Beijing,
Vincent
On Sep 23, 2008, at 10:32 PM, Jon Forrest wrote:
Given the recent discussion of whether running
multiple services and other such things
I'd argue we might know this already as middleware.
Best regards from a hotel in Beijing,
Vincent
On Sep 23, 2008, at 10:32 PM, Jon Forrest wrote:
Given the recent discussion of whether running
multiple services and other such things affects
the running of a cluster, I'd like to propose
a new
Given the recent discussion of whether running
multiple services and other such things affects
the running of a cluster, I'd like to propose
a new classification of computing.
I call this Pretty High Performance Computing (PHPC).
This is a style of computing where you sacrifice
absolute high perf
11 matches
Mail list logo
