Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-05 Thread Prentice Bisbal
Prentice Bisbal wrote: > This question is a bit off-topic, but since it involves Fortran minutia, > I figured this would be the best place to ask. This code may eventually > run on my cluster, so it's not completely off topic! > > Question: What is the maximum number of elements you can have in a

Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-04 Thread C. Bergström
Michael H. Frese wrote: I think Gus has it right. Your two arrays are 200 million floating point words each, perhaps 8 bytes per word, and therefore are approximately about 3 gigabytes total. That's too big for the default 'small' memory model. Certainly, there are no limits to array sizes

Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-03 Thread Michael H. Frese
I think Gus has it right. Your two arrays are 200 million floating point words each, perhaps 8 bytes per word, and therefore are approximately about 3 gigabytes total. That's too big for the default 'small' memory model. Certainly, there are no limits to array sizes in Fortran. Mike At 1

Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-03 Thread richard . walsh
>- Original Message - >From: "Prentice Bisbal" >To: "Beowulf Mailing List" >Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2009 1:24:00 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central >Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question > >Greg Lindahl wrote: >> On

Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-03 Thread Håkon Bugge
If it takes some time before it aborts, check the available size on your temp directory (usually /tmp). That might be the case if you're using IPO. Håkon On Nov 3, 2009, at 20:24 , Prentice Bisbal wrote: Greg Lindahl wrote: On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:17:02PM -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote:

Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-03 Thread Prentice Bisbal
Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:17:02PM -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > >> That's exactly the compiler I'm using, and it's failing at ~200 million >> elements. I'm digging through the Intel documentation. Haven't found an >> answer yet. > > Your bug report was incomplete: it rea

Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-03 Thread Mikhail Kuzminsky
In message from Prentice Bisbal (Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:09:07 -0500): This question is a bit off-topic, but since it involves Fortran minutia, I figured this would be the best place to ask. This code may eventually run on my cluster, so it's not completely off topic! Question: What is the maximu

Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-03 Thread Greg Lindahl
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:17:02PM -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > That's exactly the compiler I'm using, and it's failing at ~200 million > elements. I'm digging through the Intel documentation. Haven't found an > answer yet. Your bug report was incomplete: it really matters if the array is aut

Re: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-03 Thread Prentice Bisbal
Mikhail Kuzminsky wrote: > In message from Prentice Bisbal (Tue, 03 Nov 2009 > 12:09:07 -0500): >> This question is a bit off-topic, but since it involves Fortran minutia, >> I figured this would be the best place to ask. This code may eventually >> run on my cluster, so it's not completely off to

[Beowulf] Fortran Array size question

2009-11-03 Thread Prentice Bisbal
This question is a bit off-topic, but since it involves Fortran minutia, I figured this would be the best place to ask. This code may eventually run on my cluster, so it's not completely off topic! Question: What is the maximum number of elements you can have in a double-precision array in Fortran