Those NAMD results are up now ("Cambridge Xeon/3.0 InfiniPath" at
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/performance.html). My opinion is
that SDR is sufficient for NAMD, but I haven't had a chance to see if
there is any benefit to DDR. I did hear that the new TACC Ranger cluster
with 16 core
earch Scientist
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
435 New Science Bldg.
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
336-334-4766 lab
336-334-5122 office
336-334-5402 fax
-----Jim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -
T
I just saw a talk that somewhat covered TBB. See slides at
http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/UserInfo/Training/Workshops/Multicore/presentations/Intel_Threading_Tools.ppt
It's closer to OpenMP than pthreads. One idiom I recall is to change your
loop body to an operator, possibly adding locks or atomic
Low-tech suggestion, but why not just set the shoeboxes on top of whatever
rackmounted server they'll be connected to? Does it need to be 2U?
-Jim
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, David Mathog wrote:
We currently have two SDLT320 external "shoebox" type SDLT320
drives. It would be nice to move these
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Training/Workshop/Cluster2006/
In March and April, the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics
Group will host a pair of free workshops dedicated to teaching users and
system administrators how to specify, design, build, and run a high-
performance Linux
