On 05/11/2010 10:00 AM, Tony Travis wrote:
> We use Dancer's shell "dsh":
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/dsh.html.en
As do I. Highly recommended.
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your
Two staff couldn't handle 2k users and 100 of departments, or that much
hardware. Answering tickets or emails alone would be overwhelming.
Building/maintaining the VMs, or training/document/helping the
departments to build their own VMs is a monumental task in and of
itself. A more realistic numb
The cost for virtualization is in buying really big hardware, oodles of
memory and many many cores, that are capable of running multiple VMs,
and having that hardware configured for redundancy, high availability
and failover.
With an HPC cluster, you are typically buying hardware that is as
stripp
Is it just me, or does HPC clustering and virtualization fall on
opposite ends of the spectrum?
With virtualization, you are pooling many virtual OS/server instances on
high availablility hardware, sharing memory and cpu as demanded,
oversubscribing. What would be idle time on one server, is util
