Dear all,
same here, I should have joined the discussion earlier but currently I am
recovering from a trapped ulnaris nerve OP, so long typing is something I need
to avoid.
As it is quite apt I think, I would like to inform you about this upcoming
talk (copy&pasta):
**
*Performance Opt
I apologize - I should have written earlier, but I don't always work
with my broken right hand. It seems to me that a reasonable basis for
discussing AMD EPYC performance could be the specified performance
data in the Daresburg University benchmark from M.Guest. Yes, newer
versions of AMD EPYC and
(Note: not disagreeing at all with Gerald, actually agreeing strongly
... also, correct address this time! Thanks Gerald!)
On 6/19/21 11:49 AM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:15:40 -0400, you wrote:
The answer given, and I'm
not making this up, is that AMD listens to their
On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 06:51:58 +0100, you wrote:
>That is a very interesting point! I never thought of that.
>Also mobile drives ARM development - yes I know the CPUs in Isambard and
>Fugaku will not be seen in your mobile phone but the ecosystem is propped
>up by having a diverse market and also th
we should be upto about EV12 by now...
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:38 PM John Hearns wrote:
> Regarding benchmarking real world codes on AMD , every year Martyn Guest
> presents a comprehensive set of benchmark studies to the UK Computing
> Insights Conference.
> I suggest a Sunday afternoon with
The folks over at Devuan have chosen to name their next code release (based
on upcoming Debian 11) beowulf. I don't think it will impact this list - but
you never know.
For anyone runnng Debian on HPC / in labs: the latest Debian point release
10.10 was yesterday. Debian 11 should be released in a
