I think what I was getting at is why not include the current HPC practices to
every day desktops in the sense since we are reaching certain limits and have
to write code to take advantage of more and more cores. Why not use MPI and the
like to help distribute the software side of things to the c
Hi All. We are on a old version of LSF where I am, lsf8.
We are trying to implement job packing on a particular queue, and I find
some references online to using
RES_REQ = order[-slots]
in the lsb.queues file, and
SCHED_PER_JOB_SORT=Y in lsb.params
However, this doesn't work, as they appear to o
Damn. I knew I forgot something. Now where are my glasses.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 17:17 Douglas Eadline wrote:
>
> > I don't want to interrupt the flow but I'M feeling cheeky. One word can
> > solve everything "Fortran". There I said it.
>
> Of course, but you forgot "now get off my lawn"
>
> --
> I don't want to interrupt the flow but I'M feeling cheeky. One word can
> solve everything "Fortran". There I said it.
Of course, but you forgot "now get off my lawn"
--
Doug
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 17:03 Douglas Eadline wrote:
>
>>
>> > Then given we are reaching these limitati
I don't want to interrupt the flow but I'M feeling cheeky. One word can
solve everything "Fortran". There I said it.
Jeff
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 17:03 Douglas Eadline wrote:
>
> > Then given we are reaching these limitations how come we don’t
> integrate
> > certain things from the HPC world
> Then given we are reaching these limitations how come we donât integrate
> certain things from the HPC world into every day computing so to speak.
Scalable/parallel computing is hard and hard costs time and money.
In HPC the performance often justifies the means, in other
sectors the cost mus
Then given we are reaching these limitations how come we don’t integrate
certain things from the HPC world into every day computing so to speak.
We have. How many cores does your smartphone have?
But in most cases over the past 25 years, HPC has been about
incorporating every day computing in
Then given we are reaching these limitations how come we don’t integrate
certain things from the HPC world into every day computing so to speak.
On 14/03/2019, 19:14, "Douglas Eadline" wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
>
> Isnt there quantum computing being developed in terms of CPUs at th
> Hi Douglas,
>
> Isnt there quantum computing being developed in terms of CPUs at this
> point?
QC is (theoretically) unreasonably good at some things at other
there may me classic algorithms that work better. As far as I know,
there has been no demonstration of "quantum
supremacy" where a quant
I think this should have a new thread.
I have taken a bit of an interest in quantum computing recently.
There are no real qubit based quantum computers which are ready for work at
the moment. There ARE demonstrators available from IBM etc.
The most advanced machine which is available for work is
Hi Douglas,
Isnt there quantum computing being developed in terms of CPUs at this point?
Also is it really about the speed any more rather then how optimized the code
is to take advantage of the multiple cores that a system has?
On 13/03/2019, 22:22, "Douglas Eadline" wrote:
I reali
Then that is false advertising on the website if it has JIT.
You mention growing old while you wait for it to plot how many processes did
you start it with?
From: John Hearns
Date: Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 17:44
To: Jonathan Aquilina
Cc: Beowulf Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Large amo
Jonathan, there is absolutely no need for an apology.
Please let me explain. Julia is often referred to as a JIT compilation
language. This has bad connotations with most people - it means 'slow'.
Now lets be honest - if you have ever tried to do plots in Julia you will
end up growing old waiting f
I do apologize there but I think what is JIT is JuliaDB side of things. Julia
has a lot of potential for sure will be interesting to see how it develops as
the little I have already played with it im really liking it.
From: Beowulf on behalf of John Hearns via
Beowulf
Reply-To: John Hearns
D
> I agree with your take about slower progress on the hardware front and
> that
> software has to improve. DOE funds several vendors to do research to
> improve technologies that will hopefully benefit HPC, in particular, as
> well as the general market. I am reviewing a vendor's latest report on
Jonathan, a small correction if I may. Julia is not JIT - I asked on the
Julia discourse. A much better description is Ahead of Time compilation.
Not really important, but JIT triggers a certain response with most people.
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 07:31, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
Hi All,
What sets Julia apart is it is not a compiled language but a Just In Time (JIT)
language. I am still getting into it but it seems to be geared to complex and
large data sets. As mentioned previously I am still working with a colleague on
this prototype. With Julia at least there is an I
17 matches
Mail list logo
