just need to workout how to build large fat-trees with ethernet.
With 100G we get by with mlag for the spines (upto 640 hosts on 10g).
with our 40G/10G network, we are using ospf/mpls/vpls to give a static
fat-tree... 30k lines of config applied to ~20 switches. Nasty.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:48:10AM +0800, Stu Midgley wrote:
> That's it. As I said, I haven't used it since the early 00's.
>
> With 100Gb becoming common it might be time for these sort of MPI's to come
> back.
You could do better than these old interfaces, too... modern ethernet
chips have mu
That's it. As I said, I haven't used it since the early 00's.
With 100Gb becoming common it might be time for these sort of MPI's to come
back.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:41:36AM +0800, Stu Midgley wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:55
On 02/06/16 05:25, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
> You mean GAMMA (Genoa Active Message MAchine):
GAMMA's last update was 2009, according to their website.
Brice pulled the plug on Open-MX in December 2015.
:-(
--
Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator
VLSCI - Victorian Life Scienc
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:25:22PM -0400, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
> You mean GAMMA (Genoa Active Message MAchine):
>
> http://www.disi.unige.it/project/gamma/
> http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7253/
> http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2006-February/014846.html
I wonder how their flow co
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:41:36AM +0800, Stu Midgley wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
>
> > Do you mean Open-MX (not to be confused with that *other* OpenMX that's an
> > R project.)?
> >
> > http://open-mx.gforge.inria.fr/
> no, the one I used about 15 years ago
