Such a ban is kind of humorous when you consider that a large percentage of
Xeon production goes to China where they are integrated into systems built
by the contract manufacturers (Foxconn, Quanta, etc).
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Kilian Cavalotti <
kilian.cavalotti.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On 09/04/15 14:33, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> Very easy to confirm
I should also mention it's not a blanket ban, it's taken case-by-case.
The ruling says:
# For the National University of DefensTechnology (NUDT),
# National Supercomputing Center in Changsha (NSCC–CS),
# National Supercomputing
On 09/04/15 14:05, Kilian Cavalotti wrote:
> If that's confirmed, that would be a big loss for Intel, both in the
> short and longer terms. That after Summit, that looks like a lot to
> take in.
Very easy to confirm, they are now listed (as of February 18th) as
being on the EAR "entity" list for
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Prentice Bisbal
wrote:
> I got annoyed by this article and had to stop reading it. I'll go back later
> and try to give it a proper critique, but obviously disagree with most of
> what I've read so far. Right of the bat, the author implies that Big Data =
> HPC, an
Hi all,
According to
http://www.vrworld.com/2015/04/07/usa-shocks-intel-ban-on-china-xeon-supercomputers/,
the US government has placed the 4 major China Supercomputer Centers
on the “Denial List,” which prevents “high technology from the USA” to
be sold to these sites. On claims that they are be
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:57:34PM -0400, Scott Atchley wrote:
> There is concern by some and outright declaration by others (including
> hardware vendors) that MPI will not scale to exascale due to issues like
> rank state growing too large for 10-100 million endpoints,
That's weird, given that
On 09/04/15 03:16, H. Vidal, Jr. wrote:
> Curious as to what the body of thought is here on this article:
Some quick random thoughts on this article from down under:
1) Whilst MPI implies HPC HPC does not necessarily imply MPI (and it
never has in my decade of doing HPC, there have always been
For those old enough to have heard somebody as great as
John Lennon sing that "the dream is over",
and rather mediocre "philosophers" claim the "end of history",
prophecies that were never confirmed,
reading bombastic claims that MPI is dead is not so unsettling.
After all, reports of the death
There is concern by some and outright declaration by others (including
hardware vendors) that MPI will not scale to exascale due to issues like
rank state growing too large for 10-100 million endpoints, lack of
reliability, etc. Those that make this claim then offer up their favorite
solution (a PG
I got annoyed by this article and had to stop reading it. I'll go back
later and try to give it a proper critique, but obviously disagree with
most of what I've read so far. Right of the bat, the author implies that
Big Data = HPC, and I disagree with that.
More ranting to come
Prentice
Curious as to what the body of thought is here on this article:
http://www.dursi.ca/hpc-is-dying-and-mpi-is-killing-it/
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe
11 matches
Mail list logo
