Given prior art, I'm totally taking the fifth on this one ;-) hehehe!
http://marc.info/?l=beowulf&m=136219891020783&w=1
But all joking aside, I'm still super keen to understand all of this
at a much deeper level, certainly within the .edu space.
BTW: Chris Loken did an awesome job of explaining
Hi Prentice,
Today, IB probably means Mellanox, so why not get their pre-sales
engineer to draw you up a fabric configuration for your intended use
case?
Certainly you can have a fabric where each host has two links, and
then you segregate the different types of traffic on the different
links. B
Beowulfers,
I was talking to a colleague the other day about cluster architecture
and big data, and this colleague was thinking that it would be good to
have two separate FDR IB clusters within a single cluster: one for
message-passing, and the other purely for data movement. I'm a bit
skepti
Hi Mark,
interesting thread, specially as I wanted to ask something similar.
We are currently looking here into the possibility to do an off-site data
centre for ??? (we don't know yet) and we also have to build a new data centre
as the old one is in the way of a to be build (?) train line.
A
Given prior art, I'm totally taking the fifth on this one ;-) hehehe!
well, I notice in that old thread, you did not explain how
your EC2 config differs from the 66% worse-performing "internal kit".
it's a claim that falls into the same category as cold fusion.
(not impossible, but would be si
Hi all,
I would be interested to hear any comments you have about
delivering HPC services on a "cloudy" infrastructure.
What I mean is: suppose there is a vast datacenter filled
with beautiful new hosts, plonkabytes of storage and all
sitting on the most wonderful interconnect. One could run
