Hmmm..
On 10/2/12 8:56 AM, "Eugen Leitl" wrote:
>
>http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/10/supercomputer-moon/
>
>Why We Need a Supercomputer on the Moon
>
>By Robert McMillanEmail Author 10.02.12 6:30 AM
>
>A Lunar supercomputer could ease our deep-space networking bottleneck
>Image:
>Sim
Should we build a supercomputer on the moon?
Good God. Its a hard enough life as a field service engineer as it is.
And keeping to that Next Business Day commitment in the maintenance contract is
going to be a bitch.
The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the
http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/10/supercomputer-moon/
Why We Need a Supercomputer on the Moon
By Robert McMillanEmail Author 10.02.12 6:30 AM
A Lunar supercomputer could ease our deep-space networking bottleneck Image:
Simon Lutrin/Wired
Should we build a supercomputer on the moon?
On 2 October 2012 09:36, Hearns, John wrote:
> Interesting.
>
>> Went to ftp.redhat.com and found:
>>
>> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/RHDevToolset/SRPMS/
>>
>> Downloaded and installed the SRPMS, installed the dependencies via
>> yum, and built the RPMS.
>
> I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/09/12 10:24, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> Googled RHEL gcc 4.7 and discovered that Red Hat has something
> called Red Hat Developer Toolset which is gcc 4.7 for RHEL 5 and
> 6.
What we do is build GCC, LLVM, etc, from source and install as:
/usr/
Regarding fault tolerance, this sounds interesting.
I haven't had a chance to do more than glimpse at the web page though (9:30 UK
time and I need my coffee)
Lecture Series
"A Perspective on Exploiting Heterogeneous Fault-Tolerant Parallelism for
HPC clusters and Supercomputers"
at the
Uni
Interesting.
> Went to ftp.redhat.com and found:
>
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/RHDevToolset/SRPMS/
>
> Downloaded and installed the SRPMS, installed the dependencies via
> yum, and built the RPMS.
I would like to recommend the "mock" [1] tool for building SRPMs
On 27 September 2012 01:24, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:54:01 +0200, you wrote:
[snip]
>>
>>Even trying to compile GCC 4.7.0 both 32 and 64 bits in SL was a
>>problem though it had been
>>released for months.
>
> Not difficult.
>
> Googled RHEL gcc 4.7 and discovered that Re