On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:44:56AM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> to be honest, I don't understand what applications lead to focus on IOPS
> (rationally, not just aesthetic/ideologically). it also seems like
> battery-backed ram and logging to disks would deliver the same goods...
In HPC, the metadat
>>> Either way, I think if someone were to foolishly just toss together
100TB of data into a box they would have a hell of a time getting
>>> anywhere near even 10% of the theoretical max performance-wise.
>>
>> storage isn't about performance any more. ok, hyperbole, a little.
>> but even a
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:33:37AM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> storage isn't about performance any more. ok, hyperbole, a little.
> but even a cheap disk does > 100 MB/s, and in all honesty, there are
> not tons of people looking for bandwidth more than a small multiplier
> of that. sure, a QDR fi
On 07/22/2011 12:33 AM, Mark Hahn wrote:
>> Either way, I think if someone were to foolishly just toss together
>>> 100TB of data into a box they would have a hell of a time getting
>> anywhere near even 10% of the theoretical max performance-wise.
>
> storage isn't about performance any more. ok,
> Either way, I think if someone were to foolishly just toss together
>> 100TB of data into a box they would have a hell of a time getting
> anywhere near even 10% of the theoretical max performance-wise.
storage isn't about performance any more. ok, hyperbole, a little.
but even a cheap disk doe
> I'm curious, has anyone tried building one of these or know
> of anyone who has?
a guy here built one, and it seems to behave fine.
> Seems like a cheap solution for raw backup.
"raw"? I think the backblaze (v1) is used for rsync-based
incremental/nightly-snapshots.
but yeah, this is a lot
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:03:58PM -0400, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
> Used in a backup solution, triplication won't get you much more
> resilience than RAID6 but will pay a much greater performance penalty to
> simply get your backup or checkpoint completed.
Hey, if you don't see any benefit fro
On 07/21/11 18:07, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:55:30PM -0400, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
>> My personal experience with getting large amounts of data from local
>> storage to HDFS has been suboptimal compared to something more raw,
>
> If you're writing 3 copies of everything
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:55:30PM -0400, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
> My personal experience with getting large amounts of data from local
> storage to HDFS has been suboptimal compared to something more raw,
If you're writing 3 copies of everything on 3 different nodes, then
sure, it's a lot sl
On Thursday 21 July 2011 21:55:30 Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
> On 07/21/11 14:29, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:28:00PM -0400, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
> >> For traditional Beowulfers, spending a year or two developing custom
> >>
> >> software just to manage big data is li
On 07/21/11 14:29, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:28:00PM -0400, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
>
>> For traditional Beowulfers, spending a year or two developing custom
>> software just to manage big data is likely not worth it.
>
> There are many open-souce packages for big data,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:28:00PM -0400, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
> For traditional Beowulfers, spending a year or two developing custom
> software just to manage big data is likely not worth it.
There are many open-souce packages for big data, HDFS being one
file-oriented example in the Hado
On 07/21/11 12:09, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:45:28AM -0400, Douglas Eadline wrote:
>> I'm curious, has anyone tried building one of these or know
>> of anyone who has?
>>
>> Seems like a cheap solution for raw backup.
I have doubts about the manageability of such large data w
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:45:28AM -0400, Douglas Eadline wrote:
> I'm curious, has anyone tried building one of these or know
> of anyone who has?
>
> Seems like a cheap solution for raw backup.
We use quite a few of wire-shelved HP N36L with 8 GByte
ECC DDR3 RAM and 4x 3 TByte Hitachi drives w
I'm curious, has anyone tried building one of these or know
of anyone who has?
Seems like a cheap solution for raw backup.
--
Doug
>
> http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/
>
> --
> Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
>
http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/
--
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA
16 matches
Mail list logo