On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:40:24PM -0700, NiftyOMPI Tom Mitchell wrote:
> In a 30 second scan of GMP's arbitrary precision library I cannot tell
> if 32 and 64bit sizes fall out as equal in performance to native types.
No. It's great for arbitrary large sizes and not so good for 128 bits,
compare
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Nathan Moore wrote:
...snip...
> I used GMP's arbitrary precision library (rational number arithmetic)
> for my thesis a few years back. It was very easy to implement, but
> not fast (better on x86 hardware than sun/sgi/power as I recall). I
> too am curious abo
Hi all,
What is the be the best way of using MPI persistent communication in an
iterative/repetative kind of code about calling MPI_Free(); Should we call
MPI_Free() in every iteration or
only once when all the iterations/repetitions are performed?
Means which one is the best out of following two:
Prentice,
As was said before, I don't believe that x64 processor architectures support
128 bit precision instructions either (I did glance through the official AMD
manuals, and I've read the first 3 in the set for another project, and I
can't recall anything about operating on variables that large;
