2010/4/5 David Mathog
> > over the years i've been using netgear enterprise and home products,
> > they are wonderful in light use 80-85% max throughput, but once you
> > hit the 90+ areas they seem to start to degrade either through packet
> > loss or over heating
>
> OK, Netgear is officially s
On 4/5/2010 1:27 PM, Michael Di Domenico wrote:
> A couple small 10node clusters we have setup used to routinely drop
> off the network and the switch would have to be hard reset for it to
> return. Granted we didn't do any deep analysis (just replaced with
> cisco) and it could be attributed to s
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:01:41PM -0400, David Mathog wrote:
over the years i've been using netgear enterprise and home products,
they are wonderful in light use 80-85% max throughput, but once you
hit the 90+ areas they seem to start to degrade either through packet
loss or over heating
OK, N
> over the years i've been using netgear enterprise and home products,
> they are wonderful in light use 80-85% max throughput, but once you
> hit the 90+ areas they seem to start to degrade either through packet
> loss or over heating
OK, Netgear is officially scratched off the list.
Two votes f
A couple small 10node clusters we have setup used to routinely drop
off the network and the switch would have to be hard reset for it to
return. Granted we didn't do any deep analysis (just replaced with
cisco) and it could be attributed to some bad switches, but i've also
seen this at home with s
Michael Di Domenico
> I would have to agree. I have Netgears in my lab now and for light
> use they seem to be okay, but once you run a communications heavy MPI
> job over them they seem to fall down
Please define "fall down".
One test I have applied to a switch (only 100baseT) to see if it coul
Michael Di Domenico wrote:
I would have to agree. I have Netgears in my lab now and for light
use they seem to be okay, but once you run a communications heavy MPI
job over them they seem to fall down
I seem to remember that the Dell switches are rebadged SMC or Netgear
units. They are great
I would have to agree. I have Netgears in my lab now and for light
use they seem to be okay, but once you run a communications heavy MPI
job over them they seem to fall down
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Joe Landman
wrote:
> David Mathog wrote:
>>
>> Which of these would be good for a cluster?
