Tony Travis wrote:
> Rahul Nabar wrote:
>> If I have a option between doing Hardware RAID versus having software
>> raid via mdadm is there a clear winner in terms of performance? Or is
>> the answer only resolvable by actual testing? I have a fairly fast
>> machine (Nehalem 2.26 GHz 8 cores) and 4
Akshar bhosale wrote:
>When i do:
>
>/usr/local/mpich-1.2.6/bin/mpicc -o test test.c ,i get test ;but when i do
>/usr/local/mpich-1.2.6/bin/mpirun -np 4 test,i get
>
>p0_31341: p4_error: Path to program is invalid while starting
>/home/npsf/last with rsh on dragon: -1
>p4_error: latest ms
Leonardo Machado Moreira wrote:
> Basicaly, Is a Cluster Implementation just based on these two libraries
> MPI on the Server and SSH on the clients??
Technically you don't need a server as long as all your clients have a
copy of your application and are able to talk to each other. File
servers an
Leonardo Machado Moreira wrote:
> Basicaly, Is a Cluster Implementation just based on these two libraries
> MPI on the Server and SSH on the clients??
Technically you don't need a server as long as all your clients have a
copy of your application and are able to talk to each other. File
servers an
Mark Hahn wrote:
>> I am used to work with Arch Linux. What do you think about it?
>
> the distro is basically irrelevant. clustering is just a matter of your
> apps, middleware like mpi (may or may not be provided by the cluster),
> probably a shared filesystem, working kernel, network stack,
>
i have installed mpich 1.2 6 on my desktop (core 2 duo)
my test file is :
#include
#include
int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
int rank=0;
MPI_Init(&argc,&argv);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD,&rank);
printf("my second program rank is %d \n",rank);
MPI_Fin
[Apologies if you got multiple copies of this email. If you'd like to
opt out of these announcements, information on how to unsubscribe is
available at the bottom of this email.]
Dear Colleague:
We would like to inform you that the paper submission deadline of the Third
International Workshop
o
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:39:08 -0500
Glen Beane wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/8/10 10:14 AM, "Micha Feigin" wrote:
>
> I have a small local cluster in our lab that I'm trying to setup with minimum
> hustle to support both cpu and gpu processing where only some of the nodes
> have
> a gpu and those have
It looks like Allied Telesis makes chassis switches now too.
as well as Fortinet (I don't think Henning named them), they took over the
WovenSystems stuff after the latter went under.
interesting - I wondered what had happened to Woven. but Woven
reminds me of Gnodal, which also aims to prod
