On May 15, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Ashley Pittman wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 06:43 -0400, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
I'll echo the remarks about swapping, there is a large patch set for
swapping over IP, and we don't run that. In fact right now we run
without swap space, and vm_overcommit_ratio set
Hi folks,
I think job postings from principals are OK for these lists, apologies
in advance if they are not.
(Posting under my personal address since that is how I'm subscribed to
these lists. Strictly speaking I'm posting on behalf of my company
though)
Summery: BioTeam is a small consul
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 06:43 -0400, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> I'll echo the remarks about swapping, there is a large patch set for
> swapping over IP, and we don't run that. In fact right now we run
> without swap space, and vm_overcommit_ratio set to "90". This is
> generous enough that we're
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:00:14AM -0400, Joe Landman wrote:
> With the advent of buzz words^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Htechnologies like the
> cloud(TM)(c)(SM)*, I have a sense that stateful (disk based) installs
> are a thing of the past.
The cloud environments that I have observed all used heavy
John Hearns wrote:
2009/5/15 Joe Landman :
Swap is an issue. A somewhat hard to solve issue ... we'd recommend
actually turning off swap (and swappiness in the kernel) for diskless. Or
put a USB drive in each machine and swap on that, though, honestly, that is
as reliable as swapping over th
2009/5/15 Joe Landman :
>>> Swap is an issue. A somewhat hard to solve issue ... we'd recommend
> actually turning off swap (and swappiness in the kernel) for diskless. Or
> put a USB drive in each machine and swap on that, though, honestly, that is
> as reliable as swapping over the network. E.
Douglas Eadline wrote:
You will note that I used sufficient wiggle words "usually" and
"generally" because in my experience it always depends.
And of course my comments are from my personal
experience. I have found that diskless allows for
the entire cluster to be "re provisioned" without
have in
You will note that I used sufficient wiggle words "usually" and
"generally" because in my experience it always depends.
And of course my comments are from my personal
experience. I have found that diskless allows for
the entire cluster to be "re provisioned" without
have into re-image disks. Reboot
2009/5/15 Jonathan Aquilina :
> also dont forget the more nodes you have booting off the master the
> more access time your gonna need to do a pxe boot from the one master
> node. if you plan on splitting things up once you notice a degredation
> in booting performance and putting a certain number
On 5/13/09, Dr Cool Santa wrote:
I have a cluster of identical computers. We are planning to add more
nodes
later. I was thinking whether I should go the diskless nodes way or not?
Diskless nodes seems as a really exciting, interesting and good option,
however when I did it I needed to t
Dear All, so sorry that this is nothing to do with the
technical question/input.
Please ignore this email if you are not interested in
PhD funding.
If you would like to get a PhD funding
in the area of computation in electromagnetics
for bioengineering, please contact me ( fumie.cos...@gmail.com
11 matches
Mail list logo
