Good points (as always). I've seen good examples of people using an interpreted
language. It is easy to develop new code and algorithms and test them (I do
that quite often). As you point out, this is great for some people who don't
need to run the code many times. I've also seen people use the
On 12/28/08 7:17 AM, "Jeff Layton" wrote:
> I think I understand why people want the toolboxes - it makes coding easy.
> From what I've seen people then stay with the "prototype" code and never move
> to a compiled language such as C or Fortran. It's been a long, long time, but
> I did all of
I think I understand why people want the toolboxes - it makes coding easy. From
what I've seen people then stay with the "prototype" code and never move to a
compiled language such as C or Fortran. It's been a long, long time, but I did
all of my code prototyping for my PhD in Matlab and rewrot
- "Joe Landman" wrote:
Hi Joe, hope you're feeling better!
> This said, I hear of Java's use in HPC every now and then.
We have a few people using Java on the clusters here,
our suspicion is mainly because that's all they've been
taught (or have taught themselves). :-(
cheers,
Chris
--
C
- "Tim Cutts" wrote:
> I can't speak for Joe's class, but when I've asked Matlab users here
> about using Octave instead, they're generally not interested. Partly
> this is a somewhat irrational "it doesn't have Matlab on the cover"
> thing, but largely it's the Matlab toolboxes they wa
On 27 Dec 2008, at 9:04 pm, Jeff Layton wrote:
I hate to tangent (hijack?) this subject, but I'm curious about your
class poll. Did the people who were interested in Matlab consider
Octave?
I can't speak for Joe's class, but when I've asked Matlab users here
about using Octave instead, t
