If you are not interested in optics, press delete now.
Peter St. John wrote
> Imagine building a process at say 44 nm, then measuring
> it's output at 22nm precision. I'm considering the 22nm scale
> measurement as a distortion. Then compute the inverse; apply
> the inverse to your design; an
James Lux, P.E.
Task Manager, SOMD Software Defined Radios
Flight Communications Systems Section
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Stop 161-213
Pasadena, CA, 91109
+1(818)354-2075 phone
+1(818)393-6875 fax
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL
Vincent,
I can well imagine that the topic is very competitive at some level; and I'm
certainly not seeking to leech industrial secrets from IBM or anyone else.
I'm just curious about the physics plausibility of something vaguely along
those lines. To quote from someone who replied offline,
"...Bu
The IEEE-1588 "Precision Time Protocol" can provide such levels of
global clock
synchronization.
That's the one I was trying to remember, but I didn't compose a good
query and couldn't find it.
IIRC the NIC timestamps arriving packets right off the wire? We have
an on-chip logic ana
Hi Peter,
There is thousands of people working in those companies that produce
those machines, like ASML here does do.
ASML arguably has the best machines of the planet and that can get
proven by the fact that they can deliver to more and
more companies world wide.
I happen to know several
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lombard, David N
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 2:21 PM
> To: Prentice Bisbal
> Cc: Beowulf Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Beowulf] precise synchronization of system clocks
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at
On Sep 29, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
In the previous thread I instigated about running services in cluster
nodes, there was some mentioning of precisely synchronizing the system
clocks and this issue is also mentioned in this paper:
"The Case of Missing Supercomputer Performance
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:10:49PM -0700, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> In the previous thread I instigated about running services in cluster
> nodes, there was some mentioning of precisely synchronizing the system
> clocks and this issue is also mentioned in this paper:
>
> "The Case of Missing Superc
In catching up on email from a week at the beach (got to meet RGB for the
first time since we were undergrads) and Slashdot had this item
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/19/0126232 regarding IBM's
22nm process. The explanation (maybe a week old) is that IBM usss
mathematics to com
In the previous thread I instigated about running services in cluster
nodes, there was some mentioning of precisely synchronizing the system
clocks and this issue is also mentioned in this paper:
"The Case of Missing Supercomputer Performance: Achieving Optimal
Performance on the 8,192 processor A
Hi,
Am 29.09.2008 um 12:27 schrieb Alan Ward:
Ram disks, definately. ;-)
Afraid I'm still going with diskless nodes. You save
1. some money on the disks themselves
2. more money on solving disk failures
this highly depends on the used applications. Quantum chemistry code
like Gaussian03 or
Ram disks, definately. ;-)
Afraid I'm still going with diskless nodes. You save
1. some money on the disks themselves
2. more money on solving disk failures
3. yet more money on cooling
This may be specially important in a high-density rack situation, where if you
get the disks out of the wa
12 matches
Mail list logo
