messages into one network message. For applications cases, sometimes it
helps with performance and sometimes it does not. OSU have shown both
when would a program deliberately send such messages? isn't it something
that the program should avoid in the first place? does the MPI optimization
app
Patrick Geoffray wrote:
> > It is the same benchmark that QLogic were and are using for MPI
> > message rate, and I guess you know that better then me,
> don't you?
> > I want to make sure when one do a comparison he/she will be
> using the
> > same benchmark/output to compare.
>
> It i
At 03:20 PM 5/6/2008, Mark Hahn wrote:
We have built out a beefy install infrastructure to support a lot
of simultaneous installs...
I'm curious to hear about the infrastructure.
btw:
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207501882
Interesting...
1000 computers, ass
How Can i start bewoluf and HPC any ideas
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Greg Lindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:01:42AM -0700, Gilad Shainer wrote:
>
> > According to OSU benchmarks, InfiniHost III Ex provides >20M MPI message
> > per second.
>
> And we should all
On Sun, 4 May 2008, Mikhail Kuzminsky wrote:
"Next generation Tesla", but I don't know when. Or use AMD FireStream 9170
instead :-)
I've read somewhere that double precision performance from AMD wasn't very
good and their programming model goes more towards assembly... Besides,
AMD/ATI stil
That's going to be nifty stunt. Proving that such an install not only
can be done, it has een done. Wish I was involved.
Other suggestions: Make sure you have somebody responsible for the power
on site, blowing breakers and not being able to fix the problems would be
embaressing. Also, ma
We have built out a beefy install infrastructure to support a lot of
simultaneous installs...
I'm curious to hear about the infrastructure.
btw:
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207501882
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf
Gilad Shainer wrote:
It is the same benchmark that QLogic were and are using for MPI message
rate, and I guess you know that better then me, don't you? I want
to make sure when one do a comparison he/she will be using the same
benchmark/output to compare.
It is not the benchmark, it's the
