Mark Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=312084283
>
> very amusing and effective stunt for SiCortex!
Stunt being the operative word.
It was an interesting demo of how little power it took to run that
cluster, since people are notoriously "underpowere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Anyone seem Stream numbers for one and/or more cores from SiCortx, say
a SiCortex
Catapult System. The chip has two memory controllers, and I have
heard provides:
"more than 10 Terabytesof bandwidth"
in the largest configuration, but have not seen any measu
-- Original message --
From: Mark Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=312084283
>
> very amusing and effective stunt for SiCortex! though I wonder
> whether the total carbon footprint winds up being bigger than when
> using convent
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=312084283
very amusing and effective stunt for SiCortex! though I wonder
whether the total carbon footprint winds up being bigger than when
using conventional power (ie, that the human+foodchain system is
itself fairly high-carbon...)
_