Ashley Pittman wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:33 +1100, Chris Samuel wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Michael Will wrote:
The first advise is to stay away from redhat for file servers since
they have some bursty I/O bugs and don't support XFS.
We've run through Fedora (OK, but release cycle too qui
While it is true that MKL is threaded not all the BLAS subroutines are.
Unfortunately the manual does not explicitely explain the threadedness.
Furthermore, funny enough, at least some ACML subroutines are quicker than
the MKL ones. Admitedly the difference became smaller with the release of
MKL
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:33 +1100, Chris Samuel wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Michael Will wrote:
> > The first advise is to stay away from redhat for file servers since
> > they have some bursty I/O bugs and don't support XFS.
>
> We've run through Fedora (OK, but release cycle too quick), Ubunt
On 16 Nov 2007, at 15:40, Donald Shillady wrote:
The question is whether ESSL or Parallel-ESSL is needed to do true
parallel computing on a Quad-core chip? Basically I would like to
know if anyone is working on making a Quad-core CPU parallel
(preferably f77 or f99) under RedHat LINUX?
