At 01:11 PM 7/24/2007, Patrick Geoffray wrote:
Hi Jim,
Jim Lux wrote:
Highly parallelized real time signal processing? Seems like a classic
Wouldn't you need a real-time OS and a real-time communication layer
to do real-time processing? Or at least within the same level of
time accuracy ?
On 7/18/07, Patrick Ohly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Have you heard of PTP and considered to use it in clusters?
* How would applications or clusters benefit from a better
cluster-wide clock?
* What obstacles did or could prevent using PTP(d) for that
purpose?
Well, if one were to accept my thesis that the principle design criterion of
MS OS's (since about Win98) is market share (as oppsed to, developement
environment, for unix; real-time processing, for OS9; fault-tolerance, for
Tandem, etc) and if you define adware as willingly downloaded by the user
Hi Jim,
Jim Lux wrote:
Highly parallelized real time signal processing? Seems like a classic
Wouldn't you need a real-time OS and a real-time communication layer to
do real-time processing? Or at least within the same level of time
accuracy ? The Linux scheduler is still on a 10ms quantum o
Viruses
Infections
Spyware
Trojans and
Adware
On 24/07/07, Roberto Ammendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter St. John wrote:
> RGB asks, "...On my nice new dual core 2 GB laptop, Vista Home runs
> like -- what? What is a
> suitable metaphor for a system that can't even keep up with a moving
>
Peter St. John wrote:
RGB asks, "...On my nice new dual core 2 GB laptop, Vista Home runs
like -- what? What is a
suitable metaphor for a system that can't even keep up with a moving
mouse? ..."
We found that best definition of Vista is: a virus.
__
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 14:37 +, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 15:15 +0100, Ashley Pittman wrote:
> [examples for the need of a more accurate clock]
> > But none of the ones you list are more than vaguely related to HPC.
> [...]
> > The only thing I've found ntp to be lacking in is
At 07:15 AM 7/24/2007, Ashley Pittman wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 16:41 -0700, Jim Lux wrote:
>
> There are tons of reasons why one might want more precision than NTP
> can provide, leaving aside the obvious applications for things like
> controlling test equipment.
But none of the ones you lis
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 15:15 +0100, Ashley Pittman wrote:
[examples for the need of a more accurate clock]
> But none of the ones you list are more than vaguely related to HPC.
[...]
> The only thing I've found ntp to be lacking in is the ability to
> compile
> complex software over NFS on 2.6 kerne
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 16:41 -0700, Jim Lux wrote:
>
> There are tons of reasons why one might want more precision than NTP
> can provide, leaving aside the obvious applications for things like
> controlling test equipment.
But none of the ones you list are more than vaguely related to HPC.
Pe
- Forwarded message from Rolf Rabenseifner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Rolf Rabenseifner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:17:49 +0200 (CEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PARALLEL PROGRAMMING WORKSHOP Fall 2007, Call for Participation
Sehr geehrte Dame, sehr geehrter Herr,
11 matches
Mail list logo
