> "Our BIOS supports both types of Linux, RHEL and SLES"..
Count your blessings that they test with Linux at all. It's a huge
advance.
-- greg
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) vi
2007/7/16, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 03:36 PM 7/16/2007, Robert G. Brown wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Peter St. John wrote:
>
>Wrongo. Win2K was never REALLY pushed as a consumer product. But now
>try getting a new system over the counter with anything but Vista on it.
over the counter
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Robert G. Brown wrote:
> The real drivers will install into the BIOS and should stop being OS
> specific at all
Given the general quality of BIOS and ACPI implementations this somehow does
not fill me with a warm glow...
"Our BIOS supports both types of Linux, RHEL and SLE
At 03:36 PM 7/16/2007, Robert G. Brown wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Peter St. John wrote:
Wrongo. Win2K was never REALLY pushed as a consumer product. But now
try getting a new system over the counter with anything but Vista on it.
over the counter "consumer" you're right.
over the counter "b
> Wrongo. Win2K was never REALLY pushed as a consumer product. But now
> try getting a new system over the counter with anything but Vista on it.
> Sure, if you special order or buy online you can get XP -- probably at
> full retail. But seriously, the market is being saturated with Vista
> sys
Robert G. Brown wrote:
Wrongo. Win2K was never REALLY pushed as a consumer product. But now
W2k wasn't terrible.
try getting a new system over the counter with anything but Vista on it.
Sure, if you special order or buy online you can get XP -- probably at
Dude, I bought a Dell. No kidd
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Peter St. John wrote:
RGB asks, "...On my nice new dual core 2 GB laptop, Vista Home runs like --
what? What is a
suitable metaphor for a system that can't even keep up with a moving mouse?
..."
Jabba the Hutt. Evil, devious, immobile.
I'm reluctant to say that MSWin(any)
RGB asks, "...On my nice new dual core 2 GB laptop, Vista Home runs like --
what? What is a
suitable metaphor for a system that can't even keep up with a moving mouse?
..."
Jabba the Hutt. Evil, devious, immobile.
I'm reluctant to say that MSWin(any) is badly designed; OS's are designed
for pur
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Geoff Galitz wrote:
The lack of kernel supported checkpointing capabilities in the linux
kernel is
something that has baffled me or a while. I wonder if it was ever
submitted
and then rejected? It seems a natural fit for many organizations. Are there
hardware limitation
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Afternoon all,
I don't know how many people this affects, but I thought it was
worth posting in case people are using openMosix. The
leader of openMosix, Moshe Bar, has announced that the
openMosix project is ending.
http://sourceforge.net/forum/fo
Jim Lux wrote:
> Whoa there cowboy!! You're risking death, dismemberment, and
> egregious excitement from the destruction of your datalogger. The
> entire insides of the Kill-A-Watt are floated at line
> potential.
There's two sides to the line potential, and one is a lot worse than
the ot
Afternoon all,
I don't know how many people this affects, but I thought it was
worth posting in case people are using openMosix. The
leader of openMosix, Moshe Bar, has announced that the
openMosix project is ending.
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=715406
While I haven't used op
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 08:18:24PM -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>
> https://www.wattsupmeters.com/Communications_Protocol_v442-1.pdf
>
> I'm not familiar with usb serial devices but I don't think they're
> that hard.
They're almost always FTDI UARTS, and Just Work(TM) when you plug
them in...
If
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 18:55 +0200, Daniel Navas-Parejo Alonso wrote:
>
> Problem was, as far as I remember, only specific versions of x86/
> x86_64 linux kernel were supported, don't know if this is gonna change
> in the next future.
SCore needs to intercept network packets in the kernel, 5.x ver
14 matches
Mail list logo