On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:57:55PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote:
> >I don't see much point in having both languages in the same source
> >file.
>
> Me neither, actually. Although there might be some point in developing
> a new language that smoothly merges the desireable features of both.
Yes,
From: "Brian Dobbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Quick question... on Fortran
To: "Robert G. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Using the PGI compilers ...
> The way to do this is to use the 'mcmodel=medium' option and to promote
> integers to 8-byte values (for indexing the entries in
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Greg Lindahl wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:37:58PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote:
Who knows, in ten years we may see a merge of fortran and c into a
"supercompiler" that permits near transparent switching of syntax, or
inlining of fortran in c the way assembler can be i
Felix Rauch Valenti wrote:
On 04/05/07, Bill Broadley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geoff Galitz wrote:
> During an HPC talk some years ago, I recall someone mentioned a tool
> which can copy large datasets across a cluster using a ring topology.
> Perhaps someone here knows of this tool?
Not sure
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:37:58PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote:
> Who knows, in ten years we may see a merge of fortran and c into a
> "supercompiler" that permits near transparent switching of syntax, or
> inlining of fortran in c the way assembler can be inlined now.
Existing compilers do inli
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Toon Moene wrote:
Robert G. Brown wrote:
I am (as you may well know) extremely fortran averse. However, a
researcher in our department has recently asked what the current limits
are on the size of an array in modern fortran(s) under linux. I suppose
he'd like an answer f
The limit is 2GB for Intel ia-32 compilers, fortran or not. You may
need to compile -static to get it. Since this is half the 4GB limit of
a 32 bit system (maybe the last bit is lost because of signed
arithmetic?), I'm guessing the ia-64 compilers can have much larger
arrays.
For g77 with a 32 b
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Brian Dobbins wrote:
From one Fortran averse person to another:
Using the PGI compilers (at least as of 6.0, but 7.0 is out now and does
the same), you can allocate at -least- up to 32GB in an array with Fortran
on 64-bit systems. I say at least because I don't currently
>From one Fortran averse person to another:
Using the PGI compilers (at least as of 6.0, but 7.0 is out now and does
the same), you can allocate at -least- up to 32GB in an array with Fortran
on 64-bit systems. I say at least because I don't currently have more
than 32GB on any of my nodes. :)
>I am (as you may well know) extremely fortran averse. However, a
>researcher in our department has recently asked what the current limits
>are on the size of an array in modern fortran(s) under linux. I suppose
>he'd like an answer for both 32 and 64 bit systems. From what I have
>been able to
> I am (as you may well know) extremely fortran averse.
and Hell freezes over... Georg Bush gets an IQ above 100...
Hilary Clinton suddenly becomes nice... Pamela Anderson starts
dating a non-rock star...
Too many things happening too quickly. Ahh!
___
I am (as you may well know) extremely fortran averse. However, a
researcher in our department has recently asked what the current limits
are on the size of an array in modern fortran(s) under linux. I suppose
he'd like an answer for both 32 and 64 bit systems. From what I have
been able to goog
Am 08.05.2007 um 15:25 schrieb Angel de Vicente:
If it is of any help, we use a similar setting to the one given
below by Kilian,
where our access file in the compute nodes only has root and
myself. When a user
submits something to the queuing system (Torque+Maui), the
access.conf of the
gi
Hi,
If it is of any help, we use a similar setting to the one given below by Kilian,
where our access file in the compute nodes only has root and myself. When a user
submits something to the queuing system (Torque+Maui), the access.conf of the
given nodes is modified with a prologue script, so tha
Hi people,
I'm trying to boot from 3 1/2 diskless, I using etherboot for it, the
problem is:
When I boot from 3 1/2 diskless it's all ok, It's detected the network
card until
it try to configure the IP, load the kernel and other things, the message
that I
received is:
...
...
Probing pci nic ...
*** ***
***LAST CALL FOR PAPERS ***
*** ***
*
16 matches
Mail list logo
