On Sat, 5 May 2007, Peter St. John wrote:
> I am configuring a cluster with ssh (but without passwords) and currently
> the users can log in to compute nodes. I wish the clients to use the queue
> system (Torque, it works fine) without being able to access the compute
> nodes. In the past, we used
Hi,
this is partially triggered by the mentioniong of the SPEC MPI2007
benchmark: what are people using as a benchmark suite for RFP purposes?
We will be purchasing a shared cluster for a wide community (currently
more than 1000 users). Thus, the common response on this list to evaluate
hardware
Hi,
On Friday 04 May 2007 01:06:51 pm Peter St. John wrote:
> There was a typogrphical error in the question. I had a brief exchange
> with señor Gomez and he confirmed this translation:
>
> I am configuring a cluster with ssh (but without passwords) and
> currently the users can log in to compute
There was a typogrphical error in the question. I had a brief exchange with
señor Gomez and he confirmed this translation:
I am configuring a cluster with ssh (but without passwords) and currently
the users can log in to compute nodes.
I wish the clients to use the queue system (Torque, it works
Judd Tracy wrote:
> I am trying to bring up a small file server and am noticing some serious
> performance issues when using LVM. I created a software raid /dev/md0
How many drives? Which raid level? What stripesize? What RAID controller?
> which I can read at ~195MB/s using the raw raid devi
What model server is this?
What level raid is the software raid volume, how many drives and what
type?
How did you exactly establish the performance number?
I have done performance benchmarking with LVM over hardware raid luns
had have not been able to
show a significant performance degradation
Peter St. John wrote:
I'm thinking this must not be what the subroutine ATOB does, maybe a
call by
reference instead of call by value confusion (to me).
Yup. All Fortran calls are by reference. So the routine is just
copying one section of A to another section of A. Should be fine as
long
Orion Poplawski wrote:
So, I guess this points to a hardware issue, but it may be a somewhat
generalized hardware issue. I'd love to hear reports on other
(particularly other Tyan S2882 dual 244's) systems.
I updated the BIOS on the 244's and the problem appears to have gone
away. I should
Felix Rauch Valenti wrote:
> On 03/05/07, Alan Louis Scheinine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One possibility is nettee.
> > http://saf.bio.caltech.edu/nettee.html
>
> As a related side note: If the bandwidth you get is not what you
> expect, it may well be that your switch is bad (or that your d
I don't understand what "allocatable" and "allocate" do. It would seem that
atob writes an integer (assigned by a(i) = i) to an address which had also
been specified by the a(i)=i assignment, and was not necessarily allocated
to a. That would be expected to generate random errors, and since the
ex
Thank you all for the input, it's been very helpful in making my
clustering decisions.
On 5/3/07, Mark Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm researching setting up a cluster and I'm curious as to whether or
> not it's a good idea to set up a syslog server. The question I have
depends on how m
I gave a talk where I referred to a "ring" boot mechanism for
Warewulf using "Dolly".
http://www.cs.inf.ethz.ch/CoPs/patagonia/dolly.html
Thinking back now, I don't remember you being at that talk, so you
are probably thinking of something else. ;)
On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Geoff G
I am trying to bring up a small file server and am noticing some serious
performance issues when using LVM. I created a software raid /dev/md0
which I can read at ~195MB/s using the raw raid device, but as soon as I
put LVM on top of it the read speeds drop to ~95MB/s using a raw lvm
partition
Hi,
Im config a cluster with ssh password less, but the users can login into
nodes.
I want the clients, use de queue system (Torque, its works fine), without
access into nodes.
In the past, use rlogin, without rlogin.
Thanks.
___
Beowulf mailing list
Hi Orion,
I'm thinking you may have bad memory/hardware on one of those nodes
here mate...
Compiles and runs fine here in 32 bit ubuntu fiesty:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux harold 2.6.20-15-386 #2 Sun Apr 15 07:34:00 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/
Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
If you engineer the config well, you won't have any significant amount of
"insignificant" traffic. Whether your situation is vulnerable to minute amounts of
traffic and client-side processing of packets sent is site-specific.
Using syslog-ng (or several other options), you can configure the
ok, I succeeded.
Thanks to all for helpfull comments.
--
Maxime Kinet
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Physique Statistique et Plasmas, CP 231
Campus Plaine - Boulevard du Triomphe,
1050 Bruxelles.
Tel. : +32-2-650.59.08
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01 May 2007, at 12:34, Panag
Geoff Galitz wrote:
Hi folks,
During an HPC talk some years ago, I recall someone mentioned a tool
which can copy large datasets across a cluster using a ring topology.
Perhaps someone here knows of this tool?
Not sure about a ring topology, seems kinda silly... why not bit-torrent?
It's o
18 matches
Mail list logo