At 01:54 PM 3/9/2007, Geoff Jacobs wrote:
Gerald Davies wrote:
> On 08/03/07, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Has anyone tried using the LinkSys NSLU2 (aka, the "slug") as a
>> server in a small demo cluster?
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSLU2 for more info)
>> Seems that people get 5 M
Gerald Davies wrote:
> On 08/03/07, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Has anyone tried using the LinkSys NSLU2 (aka, the "slug") as a
>> server in a small demo cluster?
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSLU2 for more info)
>> Seems that people get 5 MB/sec sorts of speeds with NFS or FTP. While
I was a little bummed about about a basketball game last night (NC State
eliminated Duke from a tournament) and today looked at State's site for
their POV regarding that, but happened to notice
http://news.ncsu.edu/releases/2007/march/041.html, their clulster of
Playstation 3's. It's hard to feel
With 780 compute nodes, we're running with reasonable success at 256.
Cheers,
Paul
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Buccaneer for Hire. wrote:
Today, we get really good results setting the treads
to 64.
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change you
There is a section on Optimizing NFS Performance on the NFS sourceforge
site.
In summary they say that the number of NFS daemons should be 4-8 per
processor. The article also tells you how to read some of the files in
/proc to work out how much work the daemons are doing. Look at section 5.6
*** ***
***CALL FOR PAPERS ***
*** ***
**
On 08/03/07, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone tried using the LinkSys NSLU2 (aka, the "slug") as a
server in a small demo cluster?
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSLU2 for more info)
Seems that people get 5 MB/sec sorts of speeds with NFS or FTP. While
no ball of fire speed wise, it i
Hi Bill,
There is a process that enables you to get a software emtitlement to
receive software updates from Cisco, but it appears that it didn't reach
all our customers - please accept our apologies. I have escalated to the
Cisco SFS product managers (Topspin = SFS) to look into the situation
and
Thanks to everyone that replied to my questions, it has been most helpful.
Cheers,
Andrew
___
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 06:12:33PM +0200, Olli-Pekka Lehto wrote:
> I'm currently evaluating the possibility of building a ad-hoc cluster
> (aka. flash mob) at a large computer hobbyist event using Linux live
> CDs. The "cluster" would potentially feature well over a thousand
> personal computer
Robert G. Brown wrote:
Both good points. And those of us who have been around a while recall
the "thermal throttle" that Intel in particular had installed on their
CPUs for a while. You'd buy what was it a 1.6 GHz CPU at great expense,
then run it flat out and as it got hot, it would suddenly u
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Mike Davis wrote:
As usual, excellent information RGB.
The only thing that I might add which you alluded to is that even given the
same processor, and memory an application may or may not be faster on one
machine as opposed to another. A quality MB can offer you increased
As usual, excellent information RGB.
The only thing that I might add which you alluded to is that even given
the same processor, and memory an application may or may not be faster
on one machine as opposed to another. A quality MB can offer you
increased performance.
Then there's the houseke
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Bill Broadley wrote:
As Robert Brown (and others) so eloquently said. Nothing is better than your
actual application with your actual input files in an actual production run.
...
So all the above is just so much handwaving, any of dozens of factors
could double of hal
14 matches
Mail list logo
