Chris Samuel wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Mark Hahn wrote:
why V4?
- security. within a cluster, I don't see the point to, say, kerberos.
Agreed, not to mention all the pain of trying to get Kerberos tickets passed
through the queueing system and the fact that if you're running a 3 month job
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Mark Hahn wrote:
> why V4?
> - security. within a cluster, I don't see the point to, say, kerberos.
Agreed, not to mention all the pain of trying to get Kerberos tickets passed
through the queueing system and the fact that if you're running a 3 month job
it's going to be qu
In my??humble opinion, I think you can start with NFS (but using at least
NFSv4)
How stable/usable is the Linux NFSv4 implementation these days ?
why V4?
- security. within a cluster, I don't see the point to, say, kerberos.
- compound rpcs. probably provides somewhat better efficiency.
- op
On Saturday 03 March 2007 23:39, Chris Samuel wrote:
> How stable/usable is the Linux NFSv4 implementation these days ?
It sucks if you are using CentOS 4.x. With Debian Etch, it seems work pretty
well.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
___
Beowulf mailing list, Be
