Ryan Waite wrote:
I know some of you aren't, um, tolerant of Microsoft for various reasons
but I thought I'd clear up a couple errors in some of the posts. If you
hate Microsoft at least you now have an email address for when you're
feeling grumpy.
As I now have a chance for a response, I thi
Hi Geoff, comments below.
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Jacobs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 1:39 PM
To: Ryan Waite
Cc: Joe Landman; Jim Lux; Beowulf@beowulf.org; Mikhail Kuzminsky;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
>
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:23 PM
To: Ryan Waite
Cc: Beowulf@beowulf.org
Subject: RE: [Beowulf] SGI to offer Windows on clusters
>
>> I know some of you aren't, um, tolerant of Microsoft for various
reasons
>
> "toleran
On Monday 22 January 2007 16:39, Ashley Pittman wrote:
...
> In answer to a previous post about using extra CPUS/cores to alleviate
> this problem it's not a new idea, IIRC PSC were doing this six or seven
> years ago,
I was well aware that it wasn't new at all, my main point was that given
the "
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 23:12 -0500, Mark Hahn wrote:
> >>"The Case of the Missing Supercomputing Performance"
> >
> > I wondered if you were talking about that paper but it's from lanl not
> > sandia, it should be essential reading for everyone working with large
> > clusters.
>
> I love this
