I just sat in on a presentation where both streaming and meta-data
were discussed. Meta-data is the silver bullet in a Luster
environment. The conversation turned to setting up NFS for home/user,
with the nearly all other data on SFS with enough OSS and MDS servers
to provide both the throughpu
Brian D. Ropers-Huilman wrote:
On 12/11/06, Craig Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lustre supports redundant meta-data servers (MDS) and failover for the
object-storage servers (OSS). However, "high-performing" is relative.
Great at streaming data, not at meta-data.
Which is really the bane
On 12/11/06, Craig Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lustre supports redundant meta-data servers (MDS) and failover for the
object-storage servers (OSS). However, "high-performing" is relative.
Great at streaming data, not at meta-data.
Which is really the bane of all cluster file systems, is
Mark Hahn wrote:
You can look into OpenAFS but be warned that you have to know
infrastructure software quite well (LDAP+kerberos). It's
cross-platform, can
be distributed but don't think it's up to multiple writes on different
mirrors though.
and Lustre is parallel, high-performing and somewh
Eric Thibodeau wrote:
You can look into OpenAFS but be warned that you have to know infrastructure
software quite well (LDAP+kerberos). It's cross-platform, can be distributed
but don't think it's up to multiple writes on different mirrors though.
Indeed. There are many tough compromises in
Look at dcache
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon Dec 11 17:01:15 2006
To: beowulf@beowulf.org
Subject:Re: [Beowulf] distributed file storage solution?
> You can look into OpenAFS but be warned that you have to know
>infrastructure soft
i am looking for a application (most preferably, but not necessarily OSS or
free software) and that can create distributed, reliable, fault tolerant,
decentralized, high preformance file server.
how reliable/fault-tolerant? how distributed/decentralized (no servers)?
how high-performing?
I've
You can look into OpenAFS but be warned that you have to know
infrastructure software quite well (LDAP+kerberos). It's cross-platform, can
be distributed but don't think it's up to multiple writes on different
mirrors though.
and Lustre is parallel, high-performing and somewhat reliable/FT,
but
You can look into OpenAFS but be warned that you have to know infrastructure
software quite well (LDAP+kerberos). It's cross-platform, can be distributed
but don't think it's up to multiple writes on different mirrors though.
Le vendredi 8 décembre 2006 21:36, samit a écrit :
> hello list,
>
>
Scyld CW4 is based on RHEL4 and also supported on Centos 4. That does
not give you different
operating systems though, just flexible deployment of RHEL4 based HPC
compute nodes.
Note that we had to reimplement the PXE boot part to allow reasonable
scaling.
Michael
-Original Message-
Fr
hello list,
i am looking for a application (most preferably, but not necessarily OSS or
free software) and that can create distributed, reliable, fault tolerant,
decentralized, high preformance file server. I've looked at few P2P file
storing solutions that store multiple copies of file in differ
11 matches
Mail list logo
