270s) which are being used primarily for Oceanographic modelling (MPICH2
running on Debian/Linux 2.6 kernel).
on gigabit?
I had to make some tweaks to make all 4GB of RAM visible to the OS.
how much was missing, and was it just graphics aperture-related?
HT-LDT FrequencyAut
Stephen,
Search the archives of this list to find some advice from me and others
about setting the ECC features.
Cheers,
Bruce
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, stephen mulcahy wrote:
Hi,
I'm maintaining a 20-node cluster of Tyan K8SREs (4GB RAM, dual Opteron
270s) which are being used primari
On Aug 29, 2006, at 1:47 AM, Bill Broadley wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:02:12AM -0400, Lawrence Stewart wrote
AFAIK, the canonical latency benchmark is lat_mem_rd, which is
part of
the lmbench suite.
Really? Seems like more of a prefetch test then a latency benchmark.
A fixed stride
Hello, Hi All.
We are developing Beowulf Cluster for the first time at our university
department. We will perform numerical simulations in CFD on the
cluster. We have chosen that each node (master and compute) of the
cluster will be consisting of 2 AMD Dual Core Opteron Processors on
Tyan Thunder
Hi All, we are using Loadleveller 3.1 running on AIX 5.1.The users are getting more performance, when they execute their parallel jobs using poe.But, not the same(poor performance) when they submit using general class defined in the cluster.I'm not getting, whether problem with nodes or n/w
Hi,
I'm maintaining a 20-node cluster of Tyan K8SREs (4GB RAM, dual Opteron
270s) which are being used primarily for Oceanographic modelling (MPICH2
running on Debian/Linux 2.6 kernel).
I had to make some tweaks to make all 4GB of RAM visible to the OS.
I'm now at the point where I'm considering
Vincent,
I think that we have two different audiences in this discussion and you
are addressing one of them. The programming side of spec and hw
benchmarks is interesting. To me its interesting theoretically. What I
care about is how the majority of my applications perform on a given set
of h
- Original Message -
From: "Robert G. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vincent Diepeveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Geoff Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] SPEC CPU 2006 released
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
F
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:08:05 +0200
Toon Moene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert G. Brown wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Geoff Jacobs wrote:
> >
> >> I should have been more specific and said that I do not believe
> >> any integrated benchmarks packaged and shipped by SPEC are in
> >> any WS
Greg Lindahl wrote:
No surprises in the relative compiler rankings, and it seems that
nobody has done an "art" to the new suite, yet.
Nine out of seventeen (in the FP suite) done in Fortran.
I'm poised to do an INT benchmark in Fortran, just because ...
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Robert G. Brown wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Geoff Jacobs wrote:
I should have been more specific and said that I do not believe any
integrated benchmarks packaged and shipped by SPEC are in any WSOF Open
Source or Free Software. Apparently some software included in SPECCpu
2006 is in fact lice
11 matches
Mail list logo
