On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 at 7:36pm, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
smc and dell (and asante and a few others) all resell the same managed switches
made by
accton...
to be exact accton is a part of SMC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMC_Networks
Well maybe that
Hi Joshua,
I am pretty much in the same situation as yours -- about to acquire a
switch to handle our NFS-loaded cluster needs (which will have 30
nodes soon)
I presented my findings and asked for recommendations on this list not
long ago
http://www.beowulf.org/archive/2006-February/014998.html
u
Is there a way to specify to which IP pbs_sched should bind? It seems to bind
to the IP associated with the hostname of the system, by default.
wt
--
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science
__
We recently tested 48 port gigabit switches from Extreme (summit-48t) and
Force10 (s50). We found the Extreme networks switch performed better than
the Force10 when all 48 ports were active. The s50 appeared to "choke" at
certain message sizes, leading to erratic rates and overall reduced
performa
to be exact accton is a part of SMC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMC_Networks
In 1997, SMC Networks became a subsidiary of Accton Technology
Corporation, who bought the rights to the SMC Networks name. Standard
Microsystems now goes by Standard Microsystems Corporation (SMSC).
indeed HP I believe
