On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Also, the whole thing would probably be a lot more readable if the
?NOTR?/?DOTR? prefixes vanished and were replaced by full rules, wrapped
in `if %?NOTRANS_MANS%'. That would be a better name for NOTR, and
since it would then only appear a couple of t
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Well, here's a review of your patches. If you have time to address the
comments, that would be great, otherwise I will eventually do it.
Hi Ralf,
I will go through your comments and think most of them pose no problem. For
the moment just a few remar
Hi Peter,
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:43:20AM CET:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
>> This triple loop is already at 72 iterations. Not good for performance.
>> If this grows further, we may have to access variables in a different
>> manner here.
>
> I as
* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 01:27:05PM CET:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
Also, the whole thing would probably be a lot more readable if the
?NOTR?/?DOTR? prefixes vanished and were replaced by full rules, wrapped
in `if %?NOTRANS_MANS%'. Tha
