* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:21:28PM CET:
> Nonetheless, there was still a potential bug (introduced by the merge)
> lurking in there, which didn't manifest itself because, by sheer luck,
> the Automake parallel test driver worked around it (by exporting
> "srcdir=$(srcdir)
On Friday 05 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > > > > In the end, are you OK with having me to merge "test-init" to
> > > > > master right away, and do future testsuite work on
On Friday 05 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > > > In the end, are you OK with having me to merge "test-init" to master
> > > > right
> > > > away, and do future testsuite work on master only?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > Good.
> I merged
On Friday 05 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > > > In the end, are you OK with having me to merge "test-init" to
> > > > master right away, and do future testsuite work on master only?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > Good.
> I merged "tests-i
On Thursday 04 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > > In the end, are you OK with having me to merge "test-init" to master right
> > > away, and do future testsuite work on master only?
> >
> > Yes.
> Good.
I merged "tests-init" to master, fixed the resulting ChangeLog, and pushed.
(oh, and
On Thursday 04 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:03:17PM CET:
> > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:27:47PM CET:
> > > > Just one question: what about the alread
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:03:17PM CET:
> On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:27:47PM CET:
> > > Just one question: what about the already-existing "tests-init" branch?
> > > Should I try to bring i
On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:27:47PM CET:
> > On Monday 01 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > I'm so totally behind on patches and not getting better, that the
> > > strategy of ignoring testsuite work will not
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:27:47PM CET:
> On Monday 01 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I'm so totally behind on patches and not getting better, that the
> > strategy of ignoring testsuite work will not help either. So how about
> > the following. IIRC you sugge
On Monday 01 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
Hi Ralf, and thanks for bringing this up again.
> I'm so totally behind on patches and not getting better, that the
> strategy of ignoring testsuite work will not help either. So how about
> the following. IIRC you suggested a bran
Hi Stefano,
I'm so totally behind on patches and not getting better, that the
strategy of ignoring testsuite work will not help either. So how about
the following. IIRC you suggested a branch for low-danger testsuite
updates. I'm not sure if a single branch would always be the right
thing to do
11 matches
Mail list logo
