Re: tests: always update generated tests silently

2011-01-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Saturday 15 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:26:24PM CET: > > As I wrote (or copied? I can't remember) in my pending documentation > > patch on silent rules support: > > > > @cindex default verbosity for silent-rules > > Note that sil

Re: tests: always update generated tests silently

2011-01-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:26:24PM CET: > As I wrote (or copied? I can't remember) in my pending documentation > patch on silent rules support: > > @cindex default verbosity for silent-rules > Note that silent rules are @emph{disabled} by default; the user must > enabl

Re: tests: always update generated tests silently

2011-01-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
ESENDTOOSOON, sorry. On Saturday 15 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Or should we go the next step and use AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])? A possible mediation would be to enable silent by default only in builds done from a cloned git repository. I've done something similar already (caveat: for to

Re: tests: always update generated tests silently

2011-01-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hello Ralf. On Saturday 15 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Reading the log files, I notice that I forgot to use > --enable-silent-rules throughout, so that all the test generation is > done verbosely and a bit annoying when reading the log files. Now, even > if I won't forget again, our us

tests: always update generated tests silently

2011-01-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
etely silently by default? Alternatively, we could prefix them with @$(AM_V_GEN) @$(AM_V_at) ... then in silent-rules mode the GEN line would still be output. Or should we go the next step and use AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])? What do you think? Thanks, Ralf tests: always u