* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 11:13:45AM CET:
>
> BTW, there is one thing about the Automake test suite that has been
> bothering me for a long time: you often cannot interrupt it with ^C.
> I usually keep it pressed until one of the repeated interrupts finally
> kills the testin
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:16:32PM CET:
> * Benoit SIGOURE wrote:
> > Most modern OSes randomize PIDs, so it's
> > going to be cumbersome. My personal opinion would be to use something
> > based on the test name. If you want, you can try to combine the test-name
> > and
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 07:44:10PM CET:
> On Nov 4, 2007, at 7:07 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
>> - for XPASS tests we do the wrong thing: remove the test directory.
>> This is because our suite's defs.in has no idea that we are running
>> an XPASS. The keep_testdirs is
On Nov 4, 2007, at 7:07 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'm not entirely happy with this one yet. It does what is needed,
but it has warts:
- if you interrupt the test suite, you will have leftover directories,
That's a minor problem, methinks. As long as a subsequent `make
clean' Does The Righ
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW2, we could use subdirectories named after the test name rather than
> using the PID. However, I've found myself running the same test in
> parallel sometimes:
> make check TESTS=foo.test # Stop with C^Z, then run same command again
>
> and it cau
I'm not entirely happy with this one yet. It does what is needed,
but it has warts:
- if you interrupt the test suite, you will have leftover directories,
- the check-clean stuff is supposed to be niceified in a later patch
(i.e., made into a proper Automake interface).
- for XPASS tests we do t
