Hello Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:42:48AM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> RW> Should I change the patch to this end (and update the test), or OK to
> RW> apply as below?
>
> It doesn't sounds that important. Let's go w
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
RW> Should I change the patch to this end (and update the test), or OK to
RW> apply as below?
It doesn't sounds that important. Let's go with what you have.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Shared books are happy books. http://www.boo
Matching a $$tst against $(XFAIL_TESTS) currently fails in a VPATH build
with Solaris make due to the rewriting, which is not done on the first
and last element of $$list, because those words of $(TESTS) do not stand
alone in the initialization ("are not plain words", in autoconf.texi
lingo). Outp
