Re: bug#10237: bug#9928: bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

2011-12-26 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/26/11 09:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > And here is the follow-up tweaking for the test cases I had > promised. I will push in a couple of days if there is no objection. Thanks, that looks good to me; please push it as soon as you like.

Re: bug#10237: bug#9928: bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

2011-12-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 10237 + patch tags 9928 + patch thanks On 12/25/2011 07:04 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/23/11 00:50, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> could you apply the patch *not to maint nor to master*, but to a *new* >> branch (say `silent-fixes' or `silent-portability') based off of maint, >> and push that

Re: bug#9928: bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

2011-12-25 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/23/11 00:50, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > could you apply the patch *not to maint nor to master*, but to a *new* > branch (say `silent-fixes' or `silent-portability') based off of maint, > and push that new branch to the public automake repo? OK, done, as 'silent-fixes', with your recent nit-f

Re: bug#9928: bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

2011-12-23 Thread Stefano Lattarini
[adding automake-patches -- which I should have done before] On 12/22/2011 10:56 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/21/11 04:21, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> Hi Paul, thanks for the respin. My comments and objections are inlined. > > Thanks, I have a patch updated with all those comments in mind. > O