Re: bug#16302: 1.14.1: check-TESTS is not lazy enough

2013-12-31 Thread Akim Demaille
Le 31 déc. 2013 à 00:11, Stefano Lattarini a écrit : > Hi Akim. Hi! Thanks for the quick answer. >> At first sight it seems that it should be guarded by ‘test -n $$redo_log’. >> > Indeed. > >> This is *really* costly, I’d be happy to have nice workarounds. >> > Or eve better, to fix the b

Re: bug#16302: 1.14.1: check-TESTS is not lazy enough

2013-12-30 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 16302 + patch severity 16302 minor stop On 12/30/2013 03:48 PM, Akim Demaille wrote: > Hi all, > Hi Akim. > I have this piece of software with several APIs, organized in clear > layers. Building the whole package is costly, especially because of > the top-level layers (dozens of binaries),