On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Well, automake being automake, it only depends on portable awk[1] ;-)
OK, portable "nawk" actually (as found by the autoconf builtin macro
AC_PROG_AWK), but I don't know of any non-museum machine lacking that.
Good.
The new feature is already do
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> Are you referring to the GraphicsMagick testsuite? If yes, it seems to me
>> that it could benefit greatly from the use of TAP once automake 1.12 is out;
>> for example, all the 314 'tests/rwfile*.sh' tests could be rewritten as one
>> single TAP test (and similarly for
Hi Bob.
On 03/31/2012 07:15 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>>
>> Are you referring to the GraphicsMagick testsuite? If yes, it seems to me
>> that it could benefit greatly from the use of TAP once automake 1.12 is out;
>> for example, all the 314 'test
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Are you referring to the GraphicsMagick testsuite? If yes, it seems to me
that it could benefit greatly from the use of TAP once automake 1.12 is out;
for example, all the 314 'tests/rwfile*.sh' tests could be rewritten as one
single TAP test (and
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi Bob, sorry for the delay.
On 02/19/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I am again bit by automake not being able run the test suite on systems
with bounded command line length. Up to automake 1.11.2 I was able to
apply a patch by Ralf Wildenh
On 02/27/2012 12:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> [re-adding the relevant automake bug in CC]
>
> Hi Peter, thanks for chiming in.
>
> On 02/27/2012 12:15 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>
>> I *think* the environment and the command line shares space (approx 64kB,
I can confirm this, based on my testi
[re-adding the relevant automake bug in CC]
Hi Peter, thanks for chiming in.
On 02/27/2012 12:15 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> I *think* the environment and the command line shares space (approx 64kB,
> I repeat *think* here, I don't know the details off the top of my head, Cygwin
> isn't affected s
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-22 21:54:
> On 02/22/2012 09:22 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> I don't understand how that patch could actually work ... If there are
>>> too many tests in $(TESTS), there will be too many logs in $(TEST_LOGS),
>
On 02/22/2012 09:22 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>>
>> I don't understand how that patch could actually work ... If there are
>> too many tests in $(TESTS), there will be too many logs in $(TEST_LOGS),
>> and since the recipe for $(TEST_SUITE_LOG) con
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I don't understand how that patch could actually work ... If there are
too many tests in $(TESTS), there will be too many logs in $(TEST_LOGS),
and since the recipe for $(TEST_SUITE_LOG) contents the expansion of
$(TEST_LOGS), the command line leng
On 02/22/2012 03:57 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> Hi Bob, sorry for the delay.
>>
>> On 02/19/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>>> I am again bit by automake not being able run the test suite on systems
>>> with bounded command line length. U
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi Bob, sorry for the delay.
On 02/19/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I am again bit by automake not being able run the test suite on systems
with bounded command line length. Up to automake 1.11.2 I was able to
apply a patch by Ralf Wildenh
Hi Bob, sorry for the delay.
On 02/19/2012 07:55 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> I am again bit by automake not being able run the test suite on systems
> with bounded command line length. Up to automake 1.11.2 I was able to
> apply a patch by Ralf Wildenhues.
>
Which patch are you referring to exac
13 matches
Mail list logo
