Re: Spurious failures of some silent*.test tests when cc != gcc (was: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1)

2010-11-25 Thread Stefano Lattarini
JFTR, I committed a patch for this issue; see: Regards, Stefano

Spurious failures of some silent*.test tests when cc != gcc (was: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1)

2010-11-17 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > > FAIL: silentlex.test (exit: 1) > > == > > > > /tmp/am/build-alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/tests:/tmp/local/alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/bin > > :/tmp/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/opt/svr4/bin:/etc:/usr/etc > > :/u

backcompat5.test: avoid '##'-style comments inside recipe commands. (was: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1)

2010-11-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:57:14PM CET: > On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:00:16PM CET: > > > > > > > > > FAIL: backcompat5.

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-11-16 12:15 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > > I committed to msvc, merged into tests-init and merged tests-init into > master. And pushed. > > The rename was handled just fine as you said, but there was one trivial > conflict caused by the c

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > > Hi Peter, > > > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET: > >> This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init) > >> but the backport to the msvc branch is t

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-16 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-16 12:15 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET: This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-ini

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-16 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Tuesday 16 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > > Hi Peter, > > > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET: > >> This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init) > >> but the backport to the msvc branch is t

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-15 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > Hi Peter, > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET: >> This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init) >> but the backport to the msvc branch is trivial. I "stole" the xsi-test >> from libtool. >> >> Would

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:00:16PM CET: > > > > > > FAIL: backcompat5.test (exit: 1) > > > > > > > > [CUT] > > >

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:00:16PM CET: > > > FAIL: backcompat5.test (exit: 1) > > > > > [CUT] > > find ../foo-1.0 -print ## useful for debugging > > find: missing co

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET: > This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init) > but the backport to the msvc branch is trivial. I "stole" the xsi-test > from libtool. > > Would be good if someone tested on that Alpha before pushing

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 15 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2010-11-15 09:19 skrev Peter Rosin: > > diff --git a/tests/defs b/tests/defs > > index 82c3b5b..e37bb96 100644 > > --- a/tests/defs > > +++ b/tests/defs > > @@ -290,6 +290,15 @@ do > >echo "$me: running texi2dvi -o /dev/null --version" >

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-15 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-15 09:19 skrev Peter Rosin: > diff --git a/tests/defs b/tests/defs > index 82c3b5b..e37bb96 100644 > --- a/tests/defs > +++ b/tests/defs > @@ -290,6 +290,15 @@ do >echo "$me: running texi2dvi -o /dev/null --version" >( texi2dvi -o /dev/null --version ) || exit 77 >

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-15 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-15 01:39 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Monday 15 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Running MSVC on osfX.Y is not interesting. I'd write a patch to skip >> the test > Yeah, I agree this is the best option. >> but I can't then test the result. > Me neither (I don't have access to a Tr

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-14 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 15 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote: > Running MSVC on osfX.Y is not interesting. I'd write a patch to skip > the test Yeah, I agree this is the best option. > but I can't then test the result. Me neither (I don't have access to a True64/OSF system). > So I won't... Neither will I ;-)

Re: Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1

2010-11-14 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-14 23:00 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> Hello Stefano, >> >> I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in >> the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending >> stuff that has a clock tick

Testsuite failures on Tru64 OSF 5.1 (was: testsuite results from master)

2010-11-14 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Stefano, > > I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in > the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending > stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures > that a t