Re: Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 21:28 UTC, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Dave, > > * Dave Hart wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:22:32PM CET: >> The Sun NFS client intentionally defers deleting files, renaming them >> to .nfs for some period of time that is not brief enough for "make >> distcheck" to suc

Re: Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC

Hi Dave, * Dave Hart wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:22:32PM CET: > The Sun NFS client intentionally defers deleting files, renaming them > to .nfs for some period of time that is not brief enough for "make > distcheck" to succeed. How long is that period? Can it be changed? As far as I un

Re: Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC (was: testsuite results from master)

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 20:45 UTC, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:05:55PM CET: >>   > >>  checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10 > >>  All the testsuite failures seem

Re: Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC (was: testsuite results from master)

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:05:55PM CET: > > checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10 > All the testsuite failures seem spurious, and due to the following > rm error (in the "distclean"

Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC (was: testsuite results from master)

[Reposting with a better subject. Sorry for the noise.] On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Stefano, > > I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in > the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending > stuff that has a clock