Re: Testsuite failures on HP-UX 11.23 (was: Re: testsuite results from master)

Reference: [For the sake of the reading this message "in real-time": this reply has been sent pratically without changes also to the related thread "Testsuite failures on IRIX 6.5"] > > FAIL: distlinksbrk.test (exit: 1

Re: Testsuite failures on HP-UX 11.23 (was: Re: testsuite results from master)

Ping on this? Reference:

Re: testsuite results from master

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:19:00AM CET: > On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in > > the last few weeks. > Do you mean "go and fix the newly introduced regressions before doing > other

Testsuite failures on HP-UX 11.23 (was: Re: testsuite results from master)

On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Stefano, > > I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in > the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending > stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures > that a t

Re: testsuite results from master

On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Stefano, > > I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in > the last few weeks. Do you mean "go and fix the newly introduced regressions before doing other testsuite work", or "reconsider the advisability of doin

Re: testsuite results from master

Please disregard; answer to the message "Testsuite failures on Solaris 2.10 on SPARC" instead. Sorry for the noise, Stefano

Re: testsuite results from master

On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Stefano, > > I think it is time to reevaluate some of the work that has been done in > the last few weeks. I'd like to ask you to postpone pushes of pending > stuff that has a clock ticking, and look at the lots of new failures > that a t