Re: signal handling

2007-11-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:08:28AM CET: > * Bob Proulx wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:52:45PM CET: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > Ahh. More head scratching. I'd appreciate if somebody could > > > look over these two proposed patches to see if what I think how > > > sig

Re: signal handling

2007-11-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Proulx wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:52:45PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > Ahh. More head scratching. I'd appreciate if somebody could > > look over these two proposed patches to see if what I think how > > signals ought to work makes sense. > > This one I think is the opposite of w

Re: signal handling

2007-11-12 Thread Bob Proulx
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Ahh. More head scratching. I'd appreciate if somebody could > look over these two proposed patches to see if what I think how > signals ought to work makes sense. This one I think is the opposite of what it needs to be. > +trap '' $signal I think that should be in