* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 06:31:21PM CET:
> > Thanks for writing the test case, and good job, it exposes the first
> > read issue.
> >
> Oh, I thought it exposed also the second one. After all, if the
> shell bails out on a failed read, I'd expect the `$(TEST_SUITE_LOG)'
>
On Sunday 16 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 02:37:55PM CET:
> > On Sunday 16 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-20110115074814053.txt
>
> > > This is due to this portability issue:
> >
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 02:37:55PM CET:
> On Sunday 16 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-20110115074814053.txt
> > This is due to this portability issue:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.patche
On Sunday 16 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Quoting:
> http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-20110115074814053.txt
>
> | FAIL: parallel-tests9.test (exit: 1)
> |
> |
> |
> /tmp/am/build-alphaev67-dec-osf5.1/tests:/tmp/local/alphaev67-dec-osf
