On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 6:13 PM Karl Berry wrote:
>
> Sigh. I failed to note that vc-dwim did not dwim; my summary first line
> was once again not recognized. (And I guess I should update the date.)
> I'll figure that out before pushing, but anyway, the content of the
> patch is what really needs r
Sigh. I failed to note that vc-dwim did not dwim; my summary first line
was once again not recognized. (And I guess I should update the date.)
I'll figure that out before pushing, but anyway, the content of the
patch is what really needs review. Here's the actual ChangeLog entry as
written ... -k
