On 07/25/2012 03:39 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 03:26 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>
>>> Could you try what happens issuing this command as root with all the shells
>>> you have at your disposal (/bin/sh, /usr/xpg4/bin/sh, /bin/ksh and
>>> bash at least
> >
> >> The attached patch should solve the issue. Could you give it a try?
> >
> > Seems to fix that.
> >
> Good, I will soon apply it then.
And by the way, thank you for truely awesome response speed and totally cool
way that you just jump in a get things done. I think the open source wo
> The attached patch should solve the issue. Could you give it a try?
Let's see if I applied that correctly :
$ diff t/primary-prefix-couples-force-valid.sh_backup
t/primary-prefix-couples-force-valid.sh
57c57,62
< test ! -x '$(libexecdir)/bar.h'
---
> ## If this test is run as root, "
On 07/25/2012 03:26 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> Could you try what happens issuing this command as root with all the shells
>> you have at your disposal (/bin/sh, /usr/xpg4/bin/sh, /bin/ksh and
>> bash at least)?
>
> I'll see if I can find the enthusiasm for it ;-)
On 07/25/2012 02:33 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>
>> The attached patch should solve the issue. Could you give it a try?
>
> Seems to fix that.
>
Good, I will soon apply it then.
> However I am fairly certian that all files are not executable from the
> perspective of the root user. That seems
tags 12041 + patch
thanks
Hi Dennis.
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> Hah! It happens because you are running the test as root. My advice
> is: don't do that. Still, since this seems to be the only spurious
> failure experienced due to the extra privileges, it might be worth
> fixing it, since tha
