On 04/23/2012 12:51 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 04/22/2012 08:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
>>
>> FAIL: t/lex-libobj
>>
>> But setting LEXLIB to just whitespace makes the test succeed:
>>
>> diff -r -u automake-1.11d.orig/t/lex-libobj.sh automake-1.11d/t/lex-libobj.sh
>> --- automake-1.11d.orig/
On 04/23/2012 02:40 PM, Dave Hart wrote:
> Stefano,
>
> In the proposed patch, the word "foo" is used where "force" was
> apparently intended.
>
In truth, "fool" was intended. I've fixed the patch accordingly.
Thanks for catching this,
Stefano
Stefano,
In the proposed patch, the word "foo" is used where "force' was
apparently intended.
Without unwarranted aggressivity,
Dave Hart
On 04/22/2012 08:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
>>> FAIL: t/lex-libobj
>>> ==
>>
>>> + ./configure 'LEXLIB=-L /lib'
>>> checking for a BSD-compatible install...
>>> /Users/bruno/data/local-macos/bin/install -c
>>> ...
>>> + make
>>> cc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"lex-libobj\" -DP
