Re: Priorities in Automake developement

2010-08-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
This topic is actually better discussed when the list server is up again, and on the automake@ list, so others can chime in, too. So just a couple of quick notes for now, and I hope to write more about the general topic soonish: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 03:59:34PM CEST: >

Re: Priorities in Automake developement

2010-08-08 Thread Stefano Lattarini
At Sunday 08 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > This topic is actually better discussed when the list server is up > again, and on the automake@ list, so others can chime in, too. Agreed. Just one thing... > > 2. Automake, in its current incarnation, is mostly > > feature-complete IMHO > > I

Re: Priorities in Automake developement

2010-08-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 05:55:47PM CEST: > At Sunday 08 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > 2. Automake, in its current incarnation, is mostly > > > feature-complete IMHO > > > > I don't quite agree; esp. since several people want automake to do > > several other