Re: AM_PROG_CC_C_O assumption

2006-03-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> @@ -5242,7 +5242,8 @@ >> >> # libtool is always able to put the object at the proper place, >> # so we do not have to require AM_PROG_CC_C_O when building .lo files. >> - err_var ($var, "compiling `$base.c' in subdir r

Re: AM_PROG_CC_C_O assumption

2006-03-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi Ralf, >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RW> CVS Automake assumes that, as soon as per-target compile flags are used, RW> AM_PROG_CC_C_O is necessary. Not exactly : it assumes that AM_PROG_CC_C_O is necessary as soon as -c and -o are used. Automake has always used -c -

Re: AM_PROG_CC_C_O assumption

2006-03-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Alexandre, * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:51:12AM CET: > >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RW> CVS Automake assumes that, as soon as per-target compile flags are used, > RW> AM_PROG_CC_C_O is necessary. > > Not exactly : it assumes that AM_