On 04/12/2012 07:00 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> Thanks for the speedy review.
> "make distcheck" is running now.
>
Feel free to push once that passes.
Thanks again for tackling this,
Stefano
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
...
>> a subsequent "make -j3" would create the missing file.
>> That was because help2man would invoke t/wrap/aclocal.in and
>> t/wrap/automake.in, each of which would require aclocal and
>> automake, yet those two files weren't guaranteed to be created.
>> Add explicit de
Hi Jim, thanks for the patches.
On 04/12/2012 06:11 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>>> IMHO, there is only one way to work around this: don't distribute
>>> those two files, i.e., generate them at build time.
>>> That means either automake distributes the help2man script
>>> (as coreutils does) or it a
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 10:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/11/2012 09:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Surprised by parallel build failures,
>>> Oops *blush* I must admit that, while I usually run the testsuite with
>>> a high degree of para
On 04/12/2012 10:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> On 04/11/2012 09:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Surprised by parallel build failures,
>>>
>> Oops *blush* I must admit that, while I usually run the testsuite with
>> a high degree of parallelism, I also usually run the bu
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 09:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Surprised by parallel build failures,
>>
> Oops *blush* I must admit that, while I usually run the testsuite with
> a high degree of parallelism, I also usually run the build proper with
> a simple "make all", because that i
On 04/11/2012 09:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Surprised by parallel build failures,
>
Oops *blush* I must admit that, while I usually run the testsuite with
a high degree of parallelism, I also usually run the build proper with
a simple "make all", because that is so fast anyway. So I ended up
rel
